|
OER Project Community
  • User
  • All Groups
    • Big History
    • World History
    • World History AP ®
    • Climate
  • Teacher's Lounge
    Announcements, tips & more
  • More
  • Cancel
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 7 subscribers
  • Views 130 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Using AI to teach critical thinking skills AND study for a test :)

Chris Scaturo
Chris Scaturo 24 days ago

Warning: A lot of words ahead. I’m sharing this because I finally had a good idea—I usually only get one a year, so I have to make it count.

The Background: A few times a year, I give "Tell Me What You Learned" assessments. Students write claims about the unit, and I grade them on specificity—basically, how many proper nouns, domain-specific vocab words, and numbers they can jam in there. It’s not the LSAT, but it beats "The cavemen were cool and did stuff." Usually, for review, they manually hunt through their notes to build a "cheat sheet" chart of these terms.

The "Laziness" Epiphany: This year, I thought, "I’ll just have them feed their notes into AI! Efficiency! Innovation! Future-proofing!" But it felt… greasy. Like I was accidentally outsourcing the actual learning.

I asked the AI (naturally) if I was doing them a disservice. It basically told me: "Yes. Identifying what’s important is a skill, and you're letting them skip the mental workout." I told the AI, "Yeah, I was totally just thinking that," while I wiped the sweat off my forehead.

The Solution (The Human-AI Audit): Instead of choosing one or the other, I’m having them compete with the machine. Here’s the flow:

  1. The Solo Hunt: 5 minutes of silent, independent work. Find the proper nouns, vocab, and numbers. Put them in a chart.

  2. The Collab: Compare with a partner and steal their best words.

  3. The Group Share: Quick class-wide "did we miss anything big?"

  4. The AI "Check": Now, we use the tool to see what we missed (or what the AI got wrong).

The "Why": I tell the kids that finding the info themselves is active (brain on), while letting AI do it is passive (brain off). We are learning to use AI as a supervisor, not a replacement.

The Prompt: If you want to try this, have your kids copy-paste this into their AI of choice along with their notes:

"I am an 8th grade student preparing for a social studies test on [Topic]. The test requires me to write claims using specific evidence. Please go through my attached notes and create a chart of all proper nouns, domain-specific vocabulary, and numbers (with units). Use NJ State Social Studies standards as a guide for what is most relevant."

 

****WOOPS, Forgot this piece******

Then compare the notes:
  • The Overlap: What did both you and the AI find? (These are definitely on the test!)

  • The Human Edge: What did you highlight that the AI missed? (Context the AI didn't understand.)

  • The AI Edge: What did the AI find that you skipped? (Terms they might have ignored because you didn't know them.)

  • Reply
  • Cancel
  • Cancel
  • Eric Schulz
    Eric Schulz 18 days ago

    Now I want to see the students reflections at the end.  What did they find?

    • Cancel
    • Up 0 Down
    • Reply
    • Cancel
  • Chris Scaturo
    Chris Scaturo 18 days ago in reply to Eric Schulz

    Oh it was all over the map.  We had them color code the info, yellow was just your words, blue was both and red was just AI. The stronger students had more blue and yellow the kids who weren’t great note takers had more red. 

    It took more time than I thought but they were engaged and ended up doing well on the test.   

    The biggest learning point was that they were better identifiers of what was “important “.  There was a quite a few discussions on why the AI identified word wasn’t really useable, or at least if they were going to use it some real context was needed. I am looking at you Wolly Mammoth hemoglobin!

    • Cancel
    • Up 0 Down
    • Reply
    • Cancel