I walked away from the Mike Vann thread last month reenergized for teaching with Graphic Biographies. Thank you to everyone who participated; the conversation really made me think and rethink so much about how we approach these resources in the classroom. I have used so many, and I have always done the layering ("First look at the visuals, then look at the text...") but I never actually SEPARATED them until now. Such a simple idea! Such a big impact! (Such a pain to do ahead of time though!)
Here's what it looked like for the Unit 8 End of Empire Lesson on Kwame Nkrumah. I only handed out one layer at a time.

Having no text to read for the first look totally slowed down their reading and ignited more wondering. Doing this also made a noticeable difference not just in the reading/analysis process but also in the creation process. As some of you may have seen, I've played around with this idea for a few years now and have been assigning students various graphic tasks throughout the 1750 course.
This time we worked backward from the Kwame Nkrumah extended biography included in the teacher materials for this lesson, thinking about what the authors' planning page might have looked like:


After that, it made more sense to the students when they were asked to transform their research about an example of decolonization into a "draft" of a graphic narrative. I really could not believe the difference as far as the clear thought they were putting into their plans. I snapped a few pictures while walking around the room - it was just about every kid, every level learner, every level of usually bored:





Final drafts are due tomorrow! Hopefully, they will be further evidence that this strategy promoted growth.
Thank you so much Mike Vann and Trevor Getz and to all who asked such great questions in that thread!!
I know it has not been very long since then, but has anyone had a chance to put one of those ideas into action yet?



